Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2017

The Good, The Bad And The Ugly: Candour In Ex Parte Applications

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

A recent decision by the ABCA reminds us that counsel must take care to provide a balanced view of both sides and not overreach in their asks when seeking an ex parte application, ...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Co-authored by Raphael Jacob, Articling Student

A recent decision by the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) reminds us that counsel must take care to provide a balanced view of both sides and not overreach in their asks when seeking an ex parte application, lest the court set aside the sought orders entirely. In Secure 2013 Group Inc v Tiger Calcium Services Inc, 2017 ABCA 316 [Secure 2013 Group], the ABCA set aside a number of ex parte Mareva injunctions, attachment orders and Anton Piller orders against 14 parties for issues related to disclosure, overreaching terms and delay in seeking relief.

In Secure 2013 Group, the plaintiffs commenced an action against six individuals and seven corporations following their acquisition of a 67% controlling interest in Tiger Calcium Services Inc [Tiger]—one of the largest manufacturers of calcium chloride products in Western Canada. Smokey Creek, owned by two of the defendants, continued to own the remaining 33% interest of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from