Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2020

Supreme Court Of Canada Finds Arbitration Clause To Be "Uber" Unconscionable

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

On June 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On June 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller. The SCC ruled in favour of the plaintiff, allowing him to proceed with a class-action lawsuit in Ontario courts, rather than through a foreign arbitration.

At issue was an arbitration clause in a standard form contract that required claimants to pay a US$14,500 commencement fee and specified that the place (or seat) of arbitration was the Netherlands. The plaintiff, David Heller, sought to pursue a proposed class action against Uber Technologies Ltd. (Uber) and related companies seeking rights and benefits under Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA). Uber sought to stay that class action on the basis that Mr. Heller's contract with Uber required disputes to be submitted to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) for mediation and, if unsuccessful, to arbitration in the Netherlands.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

For permission to reprint articles, please contact the [email protected] Marketing Department.

© 2026 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from