Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2006

Superior Court Refuses to Authorize the Largest Proposed Class Action in Quebec´s History

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

On January 17, 2006, the Superior Court of Quebec refused to grant Option Consommateurs the authorization to institute class action proceedings against a number of drug manufacturers seeking damages in the amount of approximately CAD4 billion in the case of Option Consommateurs v. Novopharm et al.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article by Robert Torralbo, ©2006 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation - January 2006

On January 17, 2006, the Superior Court of Québec refused to grant Option Consommateurs the authorization to institute class action proceedings against a number of drug manufacturers seeking damages in the amount of approximately CAD4 billion in the case of Option Consommateurs v. Novopharm et al.

The motion seeking authorization to institute a class action was filed in February 2003, shortly after a newspaper article appeared in La Presse reporting that certain unnamed pharmaceutical manufacturers may have given "illegal" rebates to pharmacists in Québec and other provinces in the form of benefits and further reporting that an investigation was launched into this matter by the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from