Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 SEPTEMBER 2015

Statutory Third Parties Must Explain The Basis For Denial Of Coverage

This issue was dealt with recently in the Superior Court decision Lica v. Dhaliwal, 2015 ONSC 3888 released July 29, 2015.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This issue was dealt with recently in the Superior Court decision Lica v. Dhaliwal, 2015 ONSC 3888 released July 29, 2015.

Contrary to the recitals in the Reasons for Decision, the Plaintiff was represented on the motion by Hollie Nicol, not Marc Flisfeder.

The Plaintiff commenced an action against the Defendants after sustaining injuries in a motor vehicle accident.  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") had itself added as a statutory Third Party in the action pursuant to s. 258(14) of the Insurance Act.  The effect of being added as a statutory Third Party reduces the limits available to the Plaintiff from the Defendants' insurer to the amount of $200,000.00.  The Plaintiff made a claim for under insurance coverage from his own insurer, Intact Insurance Company ("Intact") pursuant to the OPCF 44 endorsement.  The Plaintiff required detailed information from State Farm with respect to its coverage position to the Defendant in order for

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from