Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JULY 2026

Status Quo, With A Twist: The SCC Reaffirms, And Reframes, The Medical Method Exclusion

Lenczner Slaght, Canada's leading litigation firm, announces major achievements including recognition as Litigation & Dispute Resolution Boutique Law Firm of the Year at the 2026 Canadian Law Awards. The firm welcomes 11 exceptional law students for summer positions and celebrates partner Sahar Talebi's receipt of the 2025 Dual JD Transnational Leader Award for her outstanding professional achievements and international contributions.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The most hotly anticipated IP decision in 2026 has arrived. The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Pharmascience v Janssen on July 17, 2026, and it is now the latest SCC authority on patentable subject matter and the leading authority on whether methods of medical treatment are patentable in Canada. This marks the Supreme Court’s first substantive patent decision in nine years.

Background & Decision on Appeal

Janssen owns Canadian Patent No. 2,655,335 (the ’335 Patent), which focuses on a specific dosing regimen for INVEGA SUSTENNA, a treatment for schizophrenia. The ’335 Patent teaches a regimen to achieve an optimum plasma concentration-time profile.

The ’335 Patent contained four types of claims including claims to “vendible products,” (meaning prefilled syringes for use according to the claimed dosing regimens) and claims to the use of a dosage form according to the claimed dosing regimens.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from