Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2006

Softwood Lumber Falls Onto NAFTA Investor-State Disputes

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

A recent ruling related to the softwood lumber dispute shows that while NAFTA, including the investor-state rules in Chapter 11, has an inherently political dimension, it is first and foremost a legal document – one whose terms will be interpreted according to the precisely-worded formulations negotiated by the Parties.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on International Trade, July 2006

Article by Cliff Sosnow, ©2006 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

A recent ruling related to the softwood lumber dispute shows that while NAFTA, including the investor-state rules in Chapter 11, has an inherently political dimension, it is first and foremost a legal document – one whose terms will be interpreted according to the precisely-worded formulations negotiated by the Parties.

The Softwood Lumber Dispute as Catalyst to Jurisdictional Ruling

Perhaps fittingly, given how it has exposed important structural weaknesses in the countervailing and dumping duty dispute settlement provisions set out in Chapter 19 of NAFTA, the softwood lumber dispute now focuses its spotlight to expose the limits of investor-state dispute settlement and the relationship of Chapter 11 to other NAFTA disciplines, in particular, the countervailing and antidumping provisions of NAFTA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from