Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2017

SCC Decision Calls Into Question Enforceability Of Choice Of Forum Clauses In Consumer Contracts

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In June 2017, the SCC released its decision in Douez v. Facebook. The case concerned the application of a choice of forum clause included in Facebook's terms of use to stay a class action...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In June 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Douez v. Facebook (Douez). The case concerned the application of a choice of forum clause included in Facebook's terms of use to stay a class action proceeding brought in British Columbia. The SCC issued a three-one-three split decision, with Justices Karakatsanis, Wagner and Gascon holding that the choice of forum clause was not enforceable and Justice Abella agreeing in the result but not in the reasons.. For a detailed discussion of this case, please see our June 2017 Blakes Bulletin: Supreme Court of Canada Allows British Columbians to Pursue Privacy Class Action Against Facebook.

This decision is noteworthy for the financial services sector as it calls into question the enforceability of choice of forum clauses in consumer contracts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from