Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JUNE 2023

Russian Federation V. Luxtona Limited: Fresh Evidence On Jurisdiction

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Can litigants introduce fresh evidence on an application to set aside a decision of an arbitral tribunal about whether it has jurisdiction to hear a dispute? According to the Ontario Court of Appeal's recent decision...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Can litigants introduce fresh evidence on an application to set aside a decision of an arbitral tribunal about whether it has jurisdiction to hear a dispute? According to the Ontario Court of Appeal's recent decision in Russian Federation v. Luxtona Limited, the answer is, with some important guidelines, "yes."

Case Background

In an arbitration seated in Toronto, Luxtona Limited (Luxtona) alleged that the Russian Federation (Russia) breached some of Luxtona's rights pursuant to the Energy Charter Treaty, 17 December 1994, 2080 U.N.T.S. 95 (Treaty), relating to protection of investments. Luxtona made this allegation in the context of its investment in a Russian energy company.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

For permission to reprint articles, please contact the [email protected] Marketing Department.

© 2026 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from