Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2017

Reinforcing The Primacy Of Privilege

At the end of 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada released two companion decisions affirming the fundamental importance of solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege to the proper functioning of the Canadian legal system.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

"...privilege has thus become much more than an evidentiary privilege; it is a substantive
right with constitutional implications, if not constitutional proportions."
1

INTRODUCTION

At the end of 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada released two companion decisions affirming the fundamental importance of solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege to the proper functioning of the Canadian legal system. In Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. University of Calgary2 (Alberta IPC), the Court considered the implications of the elevation of solicitor-client privilege beyond a rule of evidence to a rule of substance and a fundamental policy of the law, while in Lizotte v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada3 (Lizotte), the Court recognized litigation privilege as a distinct and fundamental principle of the administration of justice.4 These decisions both considered what legislative language would be sufficient to abrogate, set aside, or infringe

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from