Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2015

R. v. Nestle Canada Inc.: Settlement Privilege In Criminal Proceedings

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Canadian courts have long recognized that there is a compelling public interest in promoting an open and productive settlement process, both in civil and criminal proceedings.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Canadian courts have long recognized that there is a compelling public interest in promoting an open and productive settlement process, both in civil and criminal proceedings.[1] Plea bargaining in criminal and quasi-criminal prosecutions is essential to the proper operation of the justice system in Canada. A 1998 study found that 91.3% of all criminal cases in Ontario were resolved without a trial.[2] Courts in Canada have acknowledged that without resolution discussions, the Canadian system of criminal justice would collapse under its own weight.[3] The openness and productivity of resolution discussions is assured by the imposition of settlement privilege, which wraps a protective veil around the information that is exchanged.[4]

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from