Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 OCTOBER 2008

Preserving Privilege in a Corporate Group: Lessons from In re Teleglobe Communications Corp.

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

In re Teleglobe Communications Corp. is an important decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding the preservation of solicitor client privilege between members of the same corporate family.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article By Wendy Matheson, David Outerbridge and Laura Day*

OBA seminar: Privilege, Confidentiality and Conflicts of Interest, Oct 23.

In re Teleglobe Communications Corp.1 is an important decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding the preservation of solicitor–client privilege between members of the same corporate family.2

Canadian law is clear that the legal advice provided to a company in confidence by in-house counsel is subject to solicitor–client privilege in the same way as legal advice provided by external counsel.3 What is less clear are the answers to the following, more complicated, questions. Where inhouse counsel communicates with the parent company and one or more corporate affiliates, who is the client? Is there only one client, or are there several joint clients? Is advice that is given to the parent company privileged as against the subsidiaries? Can one member of the corporate family waive privilege for all?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from