Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 FEBRUARY 2022

Oppression Claim For Pre-shareholder Conduct Against Directors And Officers Allowed To Stand

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

The Rules of Civil Procedure permit a court to strike a claim on the grounds that it discloses no reasonable cause of action. In general, the Court applies a "plain and obvious" test on such a motion.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Rules of Civil Procedure permit a court to strike a claim on the grounds that it discloses no reasonable cause of action. In general, the Court applies a "plain and obvious" test on such a motion.

In corporate law, shareholders of a corporation can bring a claim for oppression against other shareholders and directors and officers of a corporation. But the law can be technical and sometimes it is unclear whether a plaintiff falls within the category of a complainant who can bring an oppression action or whether the directors and officers of a corporation are proper defendants.

On a motion to dismiss a plaintiff's oppression claim against directors and officers of a corporation on the grounds that the claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action, the Court, in Ninth Square Capital Corp. v. Boyes, 2021 ONSC 3878, was required to explore these issues.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from