Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 APRIL 2026

Ontario Court Upholds High Bar For Public Policy Challenges To Foreign Arbitral Awards

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In Feicheng Mining Group v. Liu, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice reaffirmed the high bar for resisting enforcement of foreign arbitral awards on public policy grounds, holding that the defence targets...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Feicheng Mining Group v. Liu, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice reaffirmed the high bar for resisting enforcement of foreign arbitral awards on public policy grounds, holding that the defence targets “repugnant laws and not repugnant facts.”

Proceedings in China

The applicant, a Chinese state-owned company, commenced an arbitration before the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) against the respondent pursuant to a repayment agreement (Repayment Agreement) in which the respondent assumed joint and several liability for the debts of a corporation in which he was a 50% shareholder and director.

The parties fully participated in the arbitration before the CIETAC, including by making submissions on the validity of the Repayment Agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

For permission to reprint articles, please contact the [email protected] Marketing Department.

© 2026 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from