Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2024

No Open Floodgates: BCCA Upholds The Defence Of Statutory Authorization For Impacts To Aboriginal Rights By Third Parties

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

On February 26, 2024, the British Columbia Court of Appeal (the BCCA) issued its decision in Thomas v. Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.1...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On February 26, 2024, the British Columbia Court of Appeal (the BCCA) issued its decision in Thomas v. Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.1 Thomas concerned an appeal of a decision by the British Columbia Supreme Court (the BCSC), which had dismissed a claim in nuisance against Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. (Rio Tinto) by the Saik'uz First Nation and Stellat'en First Nation (collectively, the First Nations).2

The BCCA largely upheld the BCSC's decision, affirming that:

  • an Aboriginal right protected under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (Section 35) can ground a common law private claim in nuisance in appropriate circumstances;3
  • a nuisance claim arising from interference with an Aboriginal right is subject to the defence of statutory authority;4

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from