Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 SEPTEMBER 2013

New Case Shows Challenge Of Litigating Prison Assaults

In a recent interview with Law Times, Gillian Hnatiw discusses how the recent case, Melvin v. Ontario, provides an important lesson for lawyers who have considered taking on a case against the Crown.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent interview with Law Times, Gillian Hnatiw discusses how the recent case, Melvin v. Ontario, provides an important lesson for lawyers who have considered taking on a case against the Crown. This case demonstrates the challenges that lawyers face in proving liability for inmate incidents, and more specifically, the challenges involved in litigating a prisoner-on-prisoner assault.

This case stemmed from an incident in 1997 when two inmates assaulted another inmate (Melvin) at the district jail in Thunder Bay, Ontario. The injured inmate suffered a serious head injury and as a result underwent a craniotomy (a procedure involving removing part of the bone from the skull to expose the brain). An action against the two defendants began in 2003.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from