Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 FEBRUARY 2025

New Approach To Housekeeping Damages + Future Compensation Risks

In Russell v. Russell, the Alberta Court of King's Bench provided valuable guidance relating to the assessment of housekeeping damages, refining the principles that should be considered in evaluating claims.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Russell v. Russell, the Alberta Court of King's Bench provided valuable guidance relating to the assessment of housekeeping damages, refining the principles that should be considered in evaluating claims for loss of housekeeping capacity. This decision underscores key factors that insurers should be mindful of in determining compensable amounts and makes a clear distinction between unpaid familial assistance and professional services.

In Russell v. Russell, the plaintiff, Tara Russell, sustained multiple injuries in a vehicle collision caused by the defendant, Keith Chiefmoon. The accident occurred on December 24, 2015, in Lethbridge, Alberta, when Chiefmoon, driving in winter conditions, lost control of the vehicle and crashed. Russell, who was a passenger, suffered significant injuries, including a severe right wrist injury, right ankle damage, chronic pain, and psychological impairments such as depression and anxiety.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from