Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JUNE 2026

National Coordination Of Class Actions

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Canadian courts are increasingly confronted with parallel class actions across multiple provinces, particularly in life sciences litigation involving the same drug or device.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

National or multi-jurisdictional class actions are common in Canada, regularly giving rise to parallel and overlapping cases across multiple provinces. This often happens in life sciences litigation, where claims relating to the same drug or device are advanced in multiple jurisdictions, leading to carriage disputes and allegations of abuse of process. Without a national framework for managing class proceedings, Canadian courts are often called upon to decide how overlapping class actions should proceed. National coordination has emerged as a response to these challenges, which, if unaddressed, have the potential to undermine a core objective of class proceedings-judicial economy.

The Ontario Superior Court recently considered these issues in Strathdee v. Johnson & Johnson Inc., 2026 ONSC 1186, a proposed multi-jurisdictional class action arising from alleged injuries associated with talc-based baby powder products. Justice Leiper refused to stay the Ontario action as an abuse of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from