Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2025

Municipality Successful At Trial After The Plaintiffs Failed To Lead Expert Evidence On A Road Maintenance Claim

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its decision in Valerio et al v. City of London et al, 2025 ONSC 4332, dismissing the plaintiffs...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its decision in Valerio et al v. City of London et al, 2025 ONSC 4332, dismissing the plaintiffs' action against a municipality and road contractor for damages caused when the undercarriage of the plaintiff's minivan hit an exposed water valve in the road within a construction zone.

The Court held that in the circumstances, expert evidence was required to establish the standard of care for road maintenance and the reasonably safe height of a water valve protruding from a road.

Background

On Aug. 7, 2013, the plaintiff, Joseph Valerio's (Mr. Valerio), was driving home with his parents in his minivan on Dundas Street, London, Ontario. The intersection of Dundas Street and Clarke Road was under construction and had been milled down. There were two water valves in the road which were ramped with asphalt and marked with fluorescent orange paint. As Mr. Valerio proceeded through the intersection, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from