Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 OCTOBER 2024

Material Adverse Effects: Insights From The High Court Of Justice

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Uncertainty caused by macroeconomic risks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, severe weather events and geopolitical tensions has given rise to increased judicial consideration of contractual terms apportioning risk in the negotiation and execution of commercial transactions.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Uncertainty caused by macroeconomic risks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, severe weather events and geopolitical tensions has given rise to increased judicial consideration of contractual terms apportioning risk in the negotiation and execution of commercial transactions. A common mechanism for apportioning such risks in the context of M&A transactions are "Material Adverse Event" Or "Material Adverse Change" (MAE) clauses. Once the subject of minimal judicial consideration, the evolving body of jurisprudence on MAE clauses gained another chapter in the recent decision of the English High Court of Justice in BM Brazil & Ors v Sibanye BM Brazil & Anor (Sibanye), which dealt with termination of an M&A transaction involving certain Brazilian mines.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from