Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 FEBRUARY 2026

Limitation Defences At Certification: Reichert V. Canada (AG), 2026 BCCA 9

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Reichert, the British Columbia Court of Appeal confirmed that judges can consider the applicable limitation period in deciding whether to certify a proposed class action.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Why this Decision Matters

In Reichert, the British Columbia Court of Appeal confirmed that judges can consider the applicable limitation period in deciding whether to certify a proposed class action. Ordinarily, s. 6(1) of the Limitation Act prevents plaintiffs from suing more than two years after they discover the harm. Previous decisions had held that limitation defences should only be considered in "exceptional circumstances" at the certification stage.

Background

In 2011, the RCMP internally raised concerns about the care provided to RCMP members by a registered psychologist under the RCMP's health benefit plan. The RCMP accessed and disclosed the health records of RCMP members to make a complaint to the College of Psychologists of British Columbia. After discovering that the RCMP had disclosed their personal records to support the complaint, several impacted members complained to the Canadian Privacy Commissioner in July 2013. In October 2015—more than

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from