Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2021

Interpreting Releases: The Supreme Court Of Canada Clarifies The Correct Approach

On July 23, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Corner Brook (City) v. Bailey ("Bailey"), clarifying how releases should be interpreted.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On July 23, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in  Corner Brook (City) v. Bailey  (“Bailey”), clarifying how releases should be interpreted.

Summary

  • The Supreme Court ruled that a release is a contract and the general principles of contractual interpretation articulated in Sattva Capital Corp v. Creston Moly Corp. (“Sattva ”) apply.
  •  
  • The rule set out in London and South Western Railway v. Blackmore  (1870), L.R. 4 H.L. (the “Blackmore Rule”) — which stated that the general words in a release are limited to those things which were specifically in the contemplation of the parties at the time the release was given — has outlived its usefulness and is subsumed entirely by the current approach to contractual interpretation set out in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from