Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2025

Ingram v Alberta: Certification For The Sake Of Judicial Economy

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Ingram v. Alberta[1], the Court of King's Bench of Alberta certified a class action on behalf of affected Alberta business owners (the "Plaintiffs")...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Ingram v. Alberta1, the Court of King's Bench of Alberta certified a class action on behalf of affected Alberta business owners (the "Plaintiffs") who allegedly suffered losses due to business restrictions and closures required by orders enacted pursuant to Alberta's Public Health Act (the "PHA")2 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (the "Impugned Orders").

This certification comes on the heels of Ingram v. Alberta (Chief Medical Officer of Health),3 where the same Court held that the Impugned Orders were ultra vires the PHA because the final decision to issue the Impugned Orders was made by Cabinet or a Cabinet committee, who did not have authority under the PHA to make such orders.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from