Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2014

In Advertising, Silence Can Be Golden - Or At Least Not Actionable

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The Court of Appeal for Ontario, in a case involving an application to certify a proposed misleading advertising class action with respect to front loading washing machines, determined that the matter should not be certified as a class action.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal for Ontario, in a case involving an application to certify a proposed misleading advertising class action with respect to front loading washing machines1, determined that the matter should not be certified as a class action. The case provides comfort for advertisers that they need not publicize all problems associated with their products.

It was alleged that Whirlpool negligently designed its early front loading machines, such that they were prone to developing an unpleasant smell as a result of mold and fungus ("bio-film") build up. Various causes of action were alleged, including breach of the express warranty provided by the manufacturer; breach of the implied warranty of fitness for purpose under the Sale of Goods Act; breach of the misleading advertising provision of the Competition Act; economic loss for negligent design of a non-dangerous consumer product; and waiver of tort.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from