Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 DECEMBER 2021

High Time For Shorter Trials

The bench and bar have long recognized that lengthy trials decrease access to justice.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The bench and bar have long recognized that lengthy trials decrease access to justice. That is no surprise: trials are expensive, long trials more so, and lawyers generally think that the longer the trial, the longer it takes to receive a decision.

The Supreme Court has said that "protracted trials" can cause Canadians "to give up on justice," and Justice Osborne's Report on Civil Justice Reform recommends that pre-trial judges "be vested with the authority to impose time limits" on trials. But time-limited trials are controversial. Critics assert that time-limited trials trade efficiency for accuracy.

Something critical is missing in this debate: data. Even rudimentary information regarding the number and length of trials and reserve periods (the time between the end of a trial and a decision) is largely unavailable, let alone data regarding how the length of trials or reserve periods affects access to justice. We do not know how many trials occur in Canada

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from