Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2016

Good To Go: Court Adopts Flexible Approach To Reformulating Classes On Certification Appeal

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

On April 6, 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Good v. Toronto (Police Services Board). The case concerns the certification of a proposed class in a proceeding arising from events surrounding the G20 Summit held in Toronto in June 2010.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On April 6, 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal (the "OCA") released its decision in Good v. Toronto (Police Services Board) ("Good"). The case concerns the certification of a proposed class in a proceeding arising from events surrounding the G20 Summit held in Toronto in June 2010. The proposed class consisted of individuals who were detained at various locations in the city as police attempted to control protests and demonstrations. The decision has important implications for the court's treatment of proposed class actions that are reformulated in the appellate process, and demonstrates the court's flexible approach to the certification criteria under s. 5(1) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 (the "CPA").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from