Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2010

Fundamental Breach Doctrine "Laid To Rest" But Public Policy Considerations Reinvigorated In Procurement Cases

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In its recent decision in "Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia (Transportation and Highways) (Tercon)", the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) eliminated the doctrine of fundamental breach and outlined a new three-step process to analyse the applicability of exclusion of liability clauses, which are particularly prevalent in the public procurement context.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Copyright 2010, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation & Dispute Resolution/Procurement, February 2010

In its recent decision in Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia (Transportation and Highways) (Tercon), the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) eliminated the doctrine of fundamental breach and outlined a new three-step process to analyse the applicability of exclusion of liability clauses, which are particularly prevalent in the public procurement context. The SCC unanimously set out its new framework for analysis of such clauses, but split five-to-four on the application of the clause to the facts of the case. The majority of the SCC found the exclusion clause inapplicable to the breach of contract by the B.C. government, in order to uphold the integrity of the public procurement process.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from