Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2022

First Reported Decision On S. 29.1 Of The Amended CPA – Bourque v Insight Productions

In Bourque v Insight Productions, Justice Belobaba applied section 29.1 of the amended Class Proceedings Act, 1992 ("CPA"), dismissing a putative class action for delay.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Bourque v Insight Productions, Justice Belobaba applied section 29.1 of the amended Class Proceedings Act, 1992 ("CPA"), dismissing a putative class action for delay.

Section 29.1 provides that, on a motion, the court must dismiss a putative class proceeding for delay unless, by the first anniversary of the day on which the proceeding was commenced, certain criteria are met, including:

  • the representative plaintiff has filed a final and complete motion record in the motion for certification; or
  • the parties have agreed in writing to a timetable for service of the representative plaintiff's motion record in the motion for certification or for completion of one or more other steps required to advance the proceeding, and have filed the timetable with the court; or 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from