Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2026

‘Final And Binding’: Ontario Court Upholds Arbitral Award Despite Finding Error Of Law

The Ontario Superior Court recently upheld an arbitration award despite finding the arbitrator committed an error of law, ruling that "final and binding" language in the parties' arbitration agreement precluded any right of appeal. This decision highlights the significant consequences contractual language about arbitration finality can have on a party's ability to challenge an unfavorable award, even when a court would otherwise agree with the unsuccessful party's position.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key takeaways

  • The Ontario Superior Court upheld an arbitration award despite finding an error of law by the arbitrator in Tedescon Infrastructure Ltd. v. The County of Simcoe.
  • The Court determined that the arbitration agreement’s clause stating the award was “final and binding” negated Tedescon’s right to appeal the award.
  • Despite finding an error of law, the Court upheld the arbitrator’s award, emphasizing the importance of the parties’ choice to make arbitration final.

In its recent decision in Tedescon Infrastructure Ltd. v. The County of Simcoe (Tedescon), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice upheld an arbitration award in a construction dispute despite finding the arbitrator had committed an error of law. Specifically, the Court found that the arbitrator erred in finding that the contractor’s contractually-permitted work stoppage was nevertheless a repudiation of the contract entitling the owner to damages for the cost of a replacement contractor. However, the Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from