Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 FEBRUARY 2009

Fiduciary Duties And Commission Income

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In a recent British Columbia Supreme Court case, “Longstaff v. Robinson and IPC Investment Corporation”, the plaintiff alleged that his broker had a fiduciary duty to him which had been breached, in addition to breaching contractual and tort duties.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent British Columbia Supreme Court case, Longstaff v. Robinson and IPC Investment Corporation, the plaintiff alleged that his broker had a fiduciary duty to him which had been breached, in addition to breaching contractual and tort duties.

In the spring of 1999, Mr. Robinson (the broker) recommended that Mr. Longstaff (the client) borrow $200,000 in order to leverage his investments. Because of a dramatic downturn in the stock market, Mr. Longstaff suffered financial losses, which he sought to recoup from Mr. Robinson.

Mr. Longstaff argued that Mr. Robinson had breached his fiduciary duties in recommending that Mr. Longstaff switch to a leveraged investing plan. Mr. Longstaff submitted that Mr. Robinson promoted this plan and frightened Mr. Longstaff into borrowing $200,000 for the purpose of purchasing investments so that Mr. Robinson could earn a substantial commission. Mr. Longstaff argued that the advice was motivated by self-interest and was given

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from