Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2013

Ex Parte Remedies And Disclosure

As I noted in my posts on Mareva Injunctions2 and Anton Piller Orders3, seeking powerful remedies can be risky.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

As I noted in my posts on Mareva Injunctions and Anton Piller Orders, seeking powerful remedies can be risky.

Because these orders often sought ex parte, the plaintiff must make full, fair and frank disclosure of all material matters of which it has knowledge. The cost of improper disclosure is steep. Failure to make proper disclosure may lead to the injunction being dissolved and/or heavy adverse costs awards.

In Factor Gas v. Jean, an Ontario Superior Court judge set aside an Anton Piller order which had authorized the search of the defendant's home due to non-disclosure of facts on the original ex parte motion and the failure of the applicant to make proper inquiries prior to resorting to the motion. Finding that the motion to obtain the Anton Piller order violated the fundamental principles of obtaining ex parte orders, the judge ordered a cost award against Factor Gas of a half million dollars.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from