Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JUNE 2014

Divisional Court Allows Examinations By Non-Health Practitioners

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The Divisional Court recently held that a Superior Court Judge has inherent jurisdiction to order a party to be examined by a non-health practitioner.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Ziebenhaus v. Bahlieda, 2014 ONSC 138

The Divisional Court recently held that a Superior Court Judge has inherent jurisdiction to order a party to be examined by a non-health practitioner.

This issue arose in the context of two separate actions in which the plaintiffs sustained serious injuries. The defendants in Ziebenhaus v. Bahlieda ("Ziebenhaus") were successful on a motion requiring the plaintiff to undergo a vocational assessment by a vocational evaluator, and the defendants in Jack v. Cripps ("Jack") were successful on a motion requiring the plaintiff to undergo a functional abilities evaluation by a chiropractor. The plaintiffs in both actions appealed these orders to the Divisional Court. The Divisional Court upheld the order in Ziebenhaus, but set aside the order in Jack.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from