Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2025

Dispute Resolution In Western Canada For Public Infrastructure Projects: The Costs Of Litigation Relative To Arbitration

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Public utilities, municipalities and other government or quasi-governmental entities are confronted with unique challenges when assessing risks related to dispute resolution.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Public utilities, municipalities and other government or quasi-governmental entities are confronted with unique challenges when assessing risks related to dispute resolution. This includes considering how the cost of legal fees and disbursements will financially impact taxpayers or require the use of public funds.

In Western Canada, arbitration can be a compelling avenue for dispute resolution due to the increased likelihood of recovering full indemnity costs. Arbitral practice and case law out of Western Canada has shown that successful parties may be able to recover all reasonable legal fees and disbursements, resulting in significant savings of taxpayer funds. This stands in stark contrast to typical costs recovery in litigation, where successful parties may only expect to recover 40–50% of incurred legal fees.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

For permission to reprint articles, please contact the [email protected] Marketing Department.

© 2026 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from