Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2005

Danier Overturned

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

The Ontario Court of Appeal has affirmed the "business judgment rule" in the context of management’s financial forecasts in an IPO prospectus. In Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc., the Court found that a forecast made by senior management is an exercise in business judgment and that courts should not second-guess management’s opinions as long as they fall within a "range of reasonableness".

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Ontario Court of Appeal has affirmed the "business judgment rule" in the context of management’s financial forecasts in an IPO prospectus. In Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc., the Court found that a forecast made by senior management is an exercise in business judgment and that courts should not second-guess management’s opinions as long as they fall within a "range of reasonableness".1

The Court also confirmed that in updating a prospectus, the distinction between "material facts" and "material changes" is key: there is no requirement under the Securities Act to update a prospectus by disclosing material facts that occur after a receipt for a final prospectus is issued.

Background

Danier

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from