Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2019

Court Refuses To Certify Investor Class Action

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

BLG was successful on behalf of an investment dealer in the recent case Fisher v. Richardson GMP and Woodward wherein the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench refused to certify an investor class action.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

BLG was successful on behalf of an investment dealer in the recent case Fisher v. Richardson GMP and Woodward wherein the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench refused to certify an investor class action.

The claim asserted that an investment advisor made unsuitable recommendations (largely in energy securities, some of which were private companies) and that the dealer failed to adequately supervise him. The court found that there was insufficient commonality among the class members to warrant a class proceeding and that the certification criteria in the Class Proceedings Act were not satisfied. The decision affirms the principle that while every client must receive suitable advice, suitability is an individual issue dependent on each client's particular circumstances and usually cannot be determined on a class-wide basis. The court found that there were in fact several "common issues", but that those issues were all "elementary" and their resolution at a common issues

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from