Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2024

Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 7 – 11, 2024)

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

In Curtis v McCague Borlack, the Court upheld the dismissal of the bulk of the claims made against counsel by a party against whom they had acted on behalf of a client.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Truong v. Jeweler's Mutual Insurance Company the Court dismissed an appeal by a jewelry insurer from an award of punitive and compensatory damages after the insurer failed to pay out on a loss despite the insured's compliance with the terms of the policy. The Court affirmed the trial judge's finding that the insurer had put forward a purposeful and unreasonable defence in an attempt to impose unbargained for obligations onto the insured.

In Curtis v McCague Borlack, the Court upheld the dismissal of the bulk of the claims made against counsel by a party against whom they had acted on behalf of a client. However, the Court allowed the appeal in part, granting the appellant the opportunity to amend his statement of claim to pursue only a claim for malicious procecution, which was the only potential claim that was not necessarily bound to fail as a result of the defendants' absolute immunity.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be ought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from