Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JULY 2018

Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 3 – 6)

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

As expected at this time of year, it was a quiet week at the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

As expected at this time of year, it was a quiet week at the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

There were only two substantive civil decisions. In Da Silva v Gomes, the motion judge had dismissed, by way of summary judgment, a claim against a soccer club, its representatives, and its governing association for allegedly failing to prevent a player from assaulting another player during a game. The Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's decision, as there was no evidence to suggest that the assault was reasonably foreseeable. Supervising authorities are not legally responsible for sudden, unexpected events that occur during an acceptable and safe activity.

In Manorgate Estate Inc. v Kirkor Architects and Planners, a builder entered into a design agreement with an architect that contained an entire agreement clause. The builder alleged that it entered into the agreement on the basis of misrepresentations by the architect as to the anticipated costs of the project. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from