Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2026

Costs Ordered Against Self-represented Litigants Who Agreed To Timetable And Failed To Comply (Erkman v. Perry)

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

Litigants who are unresponsive, fail to attend court appearances, or do not diligently pursue their case may face procedural consequences and court sanctions.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Litigants who are unresponsive, fail to attend court appearances, or do not diligently pursue their case may face procedural consequences and court sanctions. Self-represented litigants are no exception and remain subject to the same rules, deadlines, and court orders as represented parties.

In Erkman et al. v. Perry et al. (Court File No. CV-22-578301, Toronto) (not on CanLII), the Superior Court ordered $6,500 in costs against self-represented plaintiffs who failed to comply with a consent timetable, causing unnecessary delay and requiring the defendants to bring a motion to advance the litigation.

The plaintiffs commenced the action in 2022. The defendants defended the action and delivered their affidavit of documents in May 2023. Thereafter, despite repeated requests from the defendants’ counsel, the plaintiffs failed to provide their own productions or take any steps to advance their action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from