Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2016

Consequences Of Green v CIBC Take Hold In Timminco Class Action

In a secondary market class action, it is the order granting leave under the Securities Act that would be made nunc pro tunc.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The consequences of recent jurisprudence on secondary market class action limitation periods have recently manifested themselves in an unusual way in Pennyfeather v Timminco Limited ("Pennyfeather").1 Pennyfeather is a class action for alleged misrepresentations affecting the value of shares of Timminco Limited (the "Timminco Action"). The Timminco Action was subject to the ruling in Sharma v Timminco ("Sharma"),2 in which the Ontario Court of Appeal held limitation periods in secondary market misrepresentation class actions were not suspended by section 28 of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 ("CPA")3 until leave is granted under the Securities Act.4  As a result of Sharma, the Timminco Action was statute-barred. After some criticism, the Court of Appeal overruled Sharma only to be reversed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Green v CIBC ("Green").5 The SCC majority confirmed that the Securities Act limitation periods were not suspended until leave was granted, though

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from