Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 SEPTEMBER 2024

Coffeehouse Brawl: Dangers In Litigating Personal Injury Without Expert Testimony

The Plaintiff, Salm Ismail, and Defendant, Amir Hammad, were involved in an altercation at a Tim Hortons on January 2, 2013. The two had known each other since 2008 and had a long history of conflict revolving...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Ismail v Hammad, 2024 ABKB 482 highlights the importance of securing expert evidence to support a personal injury claim.

BACKGROUND

The Plaintiff, Salm Ismail, and Defendant, Amir Hammad, were involved in an altercation at a Tim Hortons on January 2, 2013. The two had known each other since 2008 and had a long history of conflict revolving around Salm's ex-wife. Amir had obtained a restraining order against Salm and intended to serve the order at the Tim Hortons. Once at the coffee shop, Salm touched Amir's arm, Amir responded by repeatedly punching Salm. Two customers then pinned down Salm while Amir continued to punch him. Salm was injured and left the scene in an ambulance.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from