Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2013

Class Action Carriage Fight Revisited After Years Of Delay

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Carriage disputes are a unique aspect of Canadian class action practice which occur when two or more plaintiffs’ counsel compete to represent a proposed class in a yet-to-be certified action. In deciding carriage disputes courts weigh a variety of different factors including the experience of counsel, funding, and the litigation plan, among others depending on the facts of the particular case. Successful counsel earns the right to continue prosecution of the action as a putative class proceeding

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Carriage disputes are a unique aspect of Canadian class action practice which occur when two or more plaintiffs' counsel compete to represent a proposed class in a yet-to-be certified action. In deciding carriage disputes courts weigh a variety of different factors including the experience of counsel, funding, and the litigation plan, among others depending on the facts of the particular case. Successful counsel earns the right to continue prosecution of the action as a putative class proceeding.  

In the most recent chapter of these types of disputes, Justice Belobaba of the Superior Court of Ontario addressed the novel issue of whether a court can revisit the issue of carriage, and reassign class counsel on the basis that the counsel initially assigned carriage had unreasonably delayed in moving the action forward.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from