Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JULY 2020

Case Study: Grossman V. Nissan Canada

An employer who is innocent of negligence or other misconduct can be vicariously liable for the tort of intrusion upon seclusion based on a data breach committed by one of its employees

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

An employer who is innocent of negligence or other misconduct can be vicariously liable for the tort of intrusion upon seclusion based on a data breach committed by one of its employees.  

Grossman v. Nissan Canada, 2019 ONSC 6180, per Belobaba, J.

Facts + Issues

In December 2017 one of Nissan's employees (who was unidentified) stole personal information relating to Nissan customers. The employee then emailed a sample of the stolen data along with a ransom demand to Nissan threatening to disclose the data unless the ransom was paid.

The Court noted that "[a]t all material times, the unknown employee was an employee authorized to conduct business on behalf of the Defendants" and that "[t]his authority included accessing the information at issue for some purposes." (para 50).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from