Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2017

Case Comment: Ongoing Gatekeeping Duty Of Trial Judge Regarding Expert Evidence Bruff-Murphy V. Gunawardena, 2017 ONCA 502

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently provided direction on the ongoing role of trial judges with respect to the admissibility of expert evidence at trial.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently provided direction on the ongoing role of trial judges with respect to the admissibility of expert evidence at trial. As noted by Justice Hourigan "The law regarding expert witnesses has evolved considerably over the last 20 years....Today, expert witnesses are required to be independent, and their function is to provide the trier of fact with expert opinion evidence that is fair, objective and non-partisan."

The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident. Liability was admitted. The jury trial dealt only with damages. At trial the plaintiff sought to exclude the evidence of Dr. Monte Bail, a psychiatrist retained by the defence.  The plaintiff argued (1) Dr. Bail's report was really just an attack on the plaintiff's credibility, and (2) Dr. Bail was biased. The trial judge allowed the doctor was allowed to testify albeit with some restrictions on the scope of his testimony.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from