Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2021

"Business Common Sense" Determines Winner Of Commission Dispute

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

When courts have to decide whose version of a conversation is more likely to have occurred, recourse must often be had to the surrounding circumstances and any available contemporaneous documentation.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

When courts have to decide whose version of a conversation is more likely to have occurred, recourse must often be had to the surrounding circumstances and any available contemporaneous documentation. In addition, in assessing the conduct of parties in a commercial dispute, the courts will sometimes apply a lens of "business common sense" when reviewing the historical evidence.

In Notsch-Kupcho v. NY Brand Studio Inc, 2021 ONSC 4271 (CanLII), Justice F.L. Myers was faced with this situation in a dispute involving a telephone conversation between a commercial real estate broker and his client over the amount of commission the client agreed to pay.

The sole issue in the dispute was whether the client had accepted an offer made by the broker to reduce his commission from 1.5% to 0.75% (a difference of $127,500), on a transaction involving the purchase of a building in Toronto for $17 million. There was no question that the buyer had agreed to pay a commission. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from