Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2010

Brokers' Report – Special Edition

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has dismissed a motion by a proposed class to certify a class action claiming that a number of mutual fund companies failed to stop market timing in the mutual funds they managed.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has dismissed a motion by a proposed class to certify a class action claiming that a number of mutual fund companies failed to stop market timing in the mutual funds they managed. The claim alleged that the activity of certain short term frequent trading market timing investors, whose purpose was to exploit stale-pricing of securities held within a mutual fund, served to have a detrimental impact on normal course investors and that the defendant fund companies permitted this market timing to occur.

IG Investment Management Ltd., CI Mutual Funds Inc., Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., AGF Funds Inc. and AIC Limited were named as defendants to the proposed class action. From 2003 to 2005, these same fund companies had been the focus of an Ontario Securities Commission probe and enforcement proceedings. The OSC concluded that the defendant fund companies had failed to implement appropriate measures to protect

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from