Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2013

British Columbia: The New Haven For Class Action Certification?

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In a September 17, 2013, decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court, "Charlton v. Abbott Laboratories Ltd.", the court certified a class action regarding the diet drug Meridia.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

INTRODUCTION

In a September 17, 2013, decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court, Charlton v. Abbott Laboratories Ltd., the court certified a class action regarding the diet drug Meridia, containing sibutramine hydrochloride monohydrate (sibutramine), against both the brand-name and generic manufacturers and confirmed that the bar for certification remains very low in British Columbia – and may now be the lowest in Canada.

Quebec has historically been perceived as the haven for class actions in Canada due to its low statutory threshold and the lack of an evidentiary requirement for certification. However, while the statutory criteria have remained the same since Quebec enacted its class proceedings legislation, the procedural landscape has evolved in the last few years. Recent decisions have demonstrated a shift to a stricter and more thorough analysis of the proposed class representative's personal claim and involvement in the proceedings. While there have

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from