Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 APRIL 2023

Bidders Can Structure Offers To Discourage The Use Of Rights Of First Refusal

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal considers the duty of good faith and honest contractual performance in the context of an asset sale involving rights of first refusal ("ROFR").

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal considers the duty of good faith and honest contractual performance in the context of an asset sale involving rights of first refusal ("ROFR"). In Greta Energy Inc. v. Pembina Pipeline Corporation,1 the Court rejected the plaintiffs' (who held ROFRs over two wind farm assets) allegations that the defendants (the vendor of the assets and the bidder) had manipulated the purchase price allocation between the assets in a bad faith attempt to prevent them from exercising their ROFRs.

The Court confirmed that vendors and bidders may act in their self-interest in a competitive bidding process. In doing so, the Court provides useful guidance on the obligations vendors and bidders owe to holders of ROFRs, particularly in situations where a package of assets are being sold en bloc.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from