Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MAY 2021

Are Costs Not Justified For A Successful Party – One With Insurance?

A trial judge has the discretion to award or not to award costs. However, the decision regarding costs can be set aside on appeal, if there has been an error in principle or if the costs award...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A trial judge has the discretion to award or not to award costs. However, the decision regarding costs can be set aside on appeal, if there has been an error in principle or if the costs award is wrong.

In Przyk v. Hamilton Retirement Group Ltd., leave was obtained from the Court of Appeal and an appeal launched to set aside the trial decision on costs.

The respondent, Przyk, slipped and fell on a sidewalk at the retirement home where she resided.

She sued the appellant, Rushdale, the owner of the retirement home, for negligence and breach of the Occupiers' Liability Act. Damages were agreed to in advance of the trial.

At trial, the jury found no liability on Rushdale and the action was dismissed.  Rushdale, as the successful party, sought an award of partial indemnity costs and was denied for 3 reasons by the trial judge:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from