Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2024

Arbitrations In An Administrative Law Context: Reasonableness And An Arbitrator's Jurisdiction

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The Alberta Court of King's Bench ("Court") addressed the reasonableness review of an arbitrator's jurisdiction in Woodlands and Brazeau. In Woodlands, the Court applied the reasonableness...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Woodlands (County) v Whitecourt (Town), 2024 ABKB 388 (“Woodlands”) and Brazeau (County) v Drayton Valley (Town), 2024 ABKB 445 (“Brazeau”)

The Alberta Court of King's Bench ("Court") addressed the reasonableness review of an arbitrator's jurisdiction in Woodlands and Brazeau. In Woodlands, the Court applied the reasonableness standard from Vavilov for administrative tribunals, as the Arbitrator's role under Part 17.2 of the Municipal Government Act ("MGA") was akin to that of a tribunal. In Brazeau, the Court reaffirmed that jurisdictional determinations made by an arbitrator are reviewed for reasonableness, barring the exceptions outlined in Vavilov.

Woodlands

In Woodlands, the Court dismissed Woodland County's application for judicial review, varying the Arbitrator's Award on one point arising from authority decided after the Arbitrator issued her award. The dispute involved amounts each municipality should pay for shared infrastructure and services and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from