Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 FEBRUARY 2021

Arbitration Clauses And Class Actions: The Cross-border Dialogue Continues In Light Of Recent SCC And SCOTUS Jurisprudence

The policy rationales that underpin enforcing arbitration agreements may potentially be at odds with those underpinning the class actions regime (see our previous posts here and here).

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The policy rationales that underpin enforcing arbitration agreements may potentially be at odds with those underpinning the class actions regime (see our previous posts here and here). These policy rationales collide when confronting the question of whether plaintiffs can waive their right to participate in a class action through a mandatory arbitration clause and, if so, when this is permissible. Canada and the United States continue to have different approaches to the question of who decides whether a dispute is arbitrable - the arbitrator or the court? With respect to enforcement in the class action context, courts in the United States tend to enforce arbitration clauses such that class actions are precluded. However, in Canada an arbitration clause that acts as a barrier to dispute resolution may be unenforceable and precluded by certain legislation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from