Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2006

Duties Relief — CITT Clarifies Application of "End Use" Provisions

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The evolution of the existing jurisprudence indicates that the Tribunal insists that for duties relief to be accorded to imported goods, the goods must be attached to a "host" good both physically as well as "functionally." In a decision dated March 20, 2006, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) clarified the circumstances in which the various so-called "end use" provisions apply to imported goods. In Jam Industries Ltd. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency, the CITT de

CanadaInternational Law

Article by Greg Kanargelidis, ©2006, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on International Trade - May 2006

The evolution of the existing jurisprudence indicates that the Tribunal insists that for duties relief to be accorded to imported goods, the goods must be attached to a "host" good both physically as well as "functionally."

In a decision dated March 20, 2006, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) clarified the circumstances in which the various so-called "end use" provisions apply to imported goods. In Jam Industries Ltd. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency, the CITT determined that the duties relief provisions do not apply when musical instruments are connected to a computer and thereby have enhanced functionality.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from